CarLane - Redesign for a Local Car Dealership
Redesigned CarLane’s shopping flow to help visitors browse inventory, compare vehicles, schedule test drives, and find financing without decision overload.
Before → After: clarifying the primary next step and adding trust above the fold.
Project overview
Audit
I audited the original site page by page. The homepage gave visitors five actions with equal weight, so there was no clear first step. The inventory pages also made it hard to compare cars, which shoppers need to do before booking a test drive.

Audit callout: multiple equal-weight CTAs creates noise and indecision.
Strategy
I aligned the experience to the real dealership funnel:
Browse → Schedule a test drive → Finance (when ready)
To reduce decision fatigue, I set CTA rules across the site:
Home: Browse Inventory (primary), Schedule Test Drive (secondary), Financing in nav
Inventory: Browsing + View Details stays the focus; filters/sort support narrowing
VDP: Schedule Test Drive becomes the primary commitment action; financing is supportive, not the first push
The 3 decisions that drove the redesign
Decision 1: One primary action per page (CTA hierarchy)
Before: Pages asked users to do five things at once.
After: Each page has one clear primary action, with supporting actions secondary.
Example - Hero page

Home: Browse Inventory is primary; Test Drive is secondary; trust moved above the fold,
Decision 2: Trust at the moment of hesitation
Before: Warranty/guarantee/ratings were present but not doing enough work.
After: Trust is positioned near the points where users hesitate (first impression + commitment moments).

Trust: guarantee + coverage presented as a quick checklist (fast to scan).
Decision 3: Faster browsing + easier comparison (Inventory + VDP)
Before: Inventory was harder to scan; Vehicle Details felt cluttered.
After: Inventory is scan-first, and the VDP focuses on a single decision moment.
Inventory

Inventory: scan order improved (model + price first), consistent specs, faster comparison.
Vehicle Details (VDP)

VDP: one decision point. Schedule Test Drive is primary, and payment and financing support it.
The Build
Base44 turned my Figma designs into a working site, which let me test inventory filtering and the financing flow in a real browser. The live site at carlanedealership.com runs on this build.
Financing placement
I did not make financing the main homepage conversion because it’s a high-friction credit application. Most users need inventory context first.
What I did instead:
Kept Browse Inventory as the main path
Promoted Schedule Test Drive as the first meaningful commitment
Made Financing easy to find via nav + a dedicated section (for users who are ready)

Financing is accessible without being forced as the first step.
System + Consistency
To keep the pages consistent, I built a small component system in Figma.
Reusable components: inventory cards, buttons and trust blocks, so new listings fit the layout without breaking it.
States: loading, empty and error states for inventory search.
Spacing and type: one spacing and type scale across every page, which kept the build close to the Figma designs.
Outcome
This was a design and strategy engagement. Analytics and post-launch measurement were outside its scope, so the validation plan below sets out how I would measure success.
Validation plan (how I'd prove it works)
Browse intent
Home → Inventory CTR (Browse clicks)
Search usage / filter interactions
Inventory views per session
Shopping intent
Inventory → VDP CTR
VDP views per session
Lead intent
Test Drive CTA clicks
Test Drive form completion rate
Click-to-call interactions (mobile)
Financing intent
Financing clicks (nav + section)
Credit app completion rate
Next test:
A/B test the homepage secondary CTA: Schedule Test Drive vs Get Prequalified and compare lead quality + conversion.



